Skip to main content
Science of Learning Icon

Metacognition

This resource page offers strategies to increase students’ awareness and regulation of their own thinking to help them become better learners.

In today’s higher education landscape, fostering independent, reflective learners is more important than ever. One powerful way to support this goal is by integrating metacognitive strategies into your teaching practice. Metacognition - thinking about one’s own thinking - helps students become aware of how they learn, monitor their progress, and adjust their strategies for success. Fostering metacognitive skills and knowledge among students not only enhances academic performance but also cultivates critical thinking and reflective practices.

Metacognition is broadly understood as encompassing two components: knowledge about cognition and regulation of cognition. Both are described below.

Metacognitive Knowledge

This refers to what learners know about their own cognition. It includes:

Declarative Knowledge: Knowing what—facts, concepts, and information about oneself as a learner (e.g., “I learn best by doing”).

Procedural Knowledge: Knowing how—skills and strategies for learning (e.g., “I know how to summarize a text”).

Conditional Knowledge: Knowing when and why to apply certain strategies (e.g., “I use flashcards when I need to memorize terms quickly”).

Metacognitive Regulation

This refers to the ability to manage one’s learning processes in real time. It includes:

Planning: Setting goals, selecting strategies, and allocating resources before learning begins.

Monitoring: Tracking one’s understanding and performance during the learning process.

Evaluating: Assessing the effectiveness of strategies and outcomes after learning.

Integrating Metacognitive Strategies into College Teaching

Instructors can integrate metacognition into their teaching by reviewing their courses and finding opportunities to discuss metacognitive knowledge and skills with the students. For example, you could ask students at the beginning of the semester how they typically prepare for classes, or in mid-semester, if the way they are studying for the course is working for them or needs improvement. Or you could have students submit exit slips to reflect on how they would use what they learned in class.

Additionally, below are three empirically supported strategies that instructors can implement to promote metacognitive development in their courses.

  • 1

    Metacognitive Prompts

    Metacognitive prompts are structured self-reflection questions designed to activate students’ awareness of their learning processes. Tanner (2012) emphasizes the utility of such prompts in guiding students through goal setting, progress monitoring, and post-task evaluation.

    Instructors can embed metacognitive prompts at strategic points throughout the semester:

    • Initial phase: Goal-setting contracts and time-management plans.
    • Mid-semester: Exit slips and reflective journals to assess progress.
    • Final phase: Summative reflections to evaluate learning strategies and outcomes.

    Tanner (2012) lists self-questions for promoting student metacognition about learning. They include questions like “What are all the things I need to do to successfully accomplish this task?”, “Which confusions remain, and how am I going to get them clarified?” and “What will I still remember 5 years from now that I learned in this course?” These questions not only support self-regulation but also provide instructors with insights into students’ cognitive engagement and help students adjust their approach to achieve their learning goals.

  • 2

    Wrappers

    Wrappers are brief metacognitive exercises attached to assessments or learning activities. They prompt students to reflect on their preparation, performance, and future strategies. Hodges et al. (2020) demonstrated that wrappers can significantly improve student achievement in STEM disciplines. Common uses of wrappers include:

    Wrappers can be implemented as a tool for reflection for:

    • Pre-activity/assessment: to encourage planning and strategy selection.
    • Post-activity/assessment: to facilitate evaluation and adjustment

    These tools foster a culture of reflective learning and help students internalize effective academic behaviors.

  • 3

    Think Aloud Protocols

    Think-aloud protocols involve verbalizing cognitive processes during problem-solving or decision-making. This strategy, commonly used in K–12 and applied disciplines, has been adapted for higher education to model expert thinking and scaffold student learning (Watson & Gentry, 2024).

    Instructors can use think-aloud protocols to: 

    • Demonstrate how to approach complex tasks or exam questions. 
    • Reveal disciplinary reasoning and heuristics. 
    • Encourage students to practice think-aloud so you can check their reasoning errors
    • Use them during small group problem-solving (Halmo et al., 2022

    For example, while solving a problem, an instructor might say:

    “I’m starting by identifying the key variables. I know from previous examples that X tends to influence Y, so I’ll test that relationship first…” 

    This approach demystifies academic reasoning and supports the development of students’ metacognitive regulation. Additionally, it helps the students to build disciplinary procedural knowledge (e.g., how to solve problems, do research, write a paper, etc.) and enhance their critical thinking skills. 

The integration of metacognitive strategies into college teaching offers a robust framework for enhancing student learning and academic success. This article provides three concrete strategies for college instructors: metacognitive prompts, wrappers, and think-aloud protocols. Additionally, the framework of metacognitive regulation and knowledge might help you formulate additional strategies you can use to cultivate reflective, self-directed learners. 

Resources

References

Halmo, S. M., Bremers, E. K., Fuller, S., & Stanton, J. D. (2022). “Oh, that makes sense”: Social Metacognition in Small-Group Problem Solving. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(3), ar58. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-01-0009

Hodges, L. C., Beall, L. C., Anderson, E. C., Carpenter, T. S., Cui, L., Feeser, E., Gierasch, T., Nanes, K. M., Perks, H. M., & Wagner, C. (2020). Effect of Exam Wrappers on Student Achievement in Multiple, Large STEM Courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 50(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/0047231X.2020.12290677

Stanton, J. D., Sebesta, A. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2021). Fostering Metacognition to Support Student Learning and Performance. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(2), fe3. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-12-0289

Tanner, K. D. (2012). Promoting Student Metacognition. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0033

Watson, D., & Gentry, J. (2024). Think Aloud Videos and Assessment in an Introductory Economics Class for Undergraduate Students. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 20. https://doi.org/10.46504/20202402wa

Other University Websites:

Columbia University Center for Teaching and Learning - Metacognition

MIT Teaching + Learning Lab - Metacognition

Yale University Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning - Metacognition


Written by Mayuko Nakamura, Assistant Director for Assessment and Equitable Pedagogy, Center for Integrated Professional Development. Last updated 10/16/2025